EDITORIAL: Proposition 19: legalizing pot

2010-09-29T16:15:00Z EDITORIAL: Proposition 19: legalizing pot Santa Maria Times
September 29, 2010 4:15 pm

Simply stated, passage of Prop. 19 would allow Californians 21 years old or older to possess, cultivate or transport small amounts of marijuana for personal use.

Prop. 19 also authorizes local governments to regulate and tax commercial production and sale of marijuana.

All other laws on the books pertaining to marijuana possession on school grounds, using it in public, smoking it while minors are present, or providing it to anyone under 21 years old, driving under the influence, etc., would remain on the books.

Advocates point to the tens of millions of dollars that could be saved annually by state and local governments on the costs of incarcerating and supervising marijuana offenders. They also tout the benefits of legalizing a product that could then be taxed.

We will not dispute those claims. But before voters race to the polls next month to legalize the use of marijuana by adults, we need to sit down, strip out the emotional aspects, and have a serious debate about legalizing pot.

That discussion has not only not occurred with regard to Prop. 19, we believe it's safe to say this measure is too flawed to be taken seriously.

Among the major loopholes is that the claim of tax benefits are nebulous, at best. Nowhere in Prop. 19 is there language providing for specific taxes. Passage of Prop. 19 would only give a green light to the state Legislature and local governments to set up taxing mechanisms. Think about it.

In fact, California essentially decriminalized most personal marijuana use and possession for non-criminals more than three decades ago.

The medical use of marijuana has shown considerable value, but that's not what Prop. 19 is about. Before stepping into this unknown, we need a more comprehensive debate - and a better-written ballot measure.

We recommend a "no" vote on Proposition 19. See this editorial in tomorrow's Santa Maria Times.

Copyright 2015 Santa Maria Times. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

No Comments Posted.

Civil Dialogue Policy for Commenting on SantaMariaTimes.com

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Comments can only be submitted by registered users. By posting comments on our site, you are agreeing to the following terms:

Commentary and photos submitted to the Santa Maria Times (SantaMariaTimes.com) may be published or distributed in print, electronically or other forms. Opinions expressed in SantaMariaTimes.com's comments reflect the opinions of the author, and are not necessarily the opinions of the Santa Maria Times or its parent company. See the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Our guidelines prohibit the solicitation of products or services, the impersonation of another site user, threatening or harassing postings and the use of vulgar, abusive, obscene or sexually oriented language, defamatory or illegal material. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, disability or other classification. It's fine to criticize ideas, but ad hominem attacks on other site users are prohibited. Users who violate those standards may lose their privileges on SantaMariaTimes.com.

You may not post copyrighted material from another publication. (Link to it instead, using a headline or very brief excerpt.)

No short policy such as this can spell out all possible instances of material or behavior that we might deem to be a violation of our publishing standards, and we reserve the right to remove any material posted to the site.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick